ningis n asked:


given that’s the committee of the U.S. senate wich is charged with measures and policies for protecting the security and safety of our country?

scrooge asked:


does that mean that now the inmates are going to run the asylum?

Bob G asked:


What would the outrage be if Bush’s organization declared all his dissenters to be terrorist risks?

Miracle asked:


Looking for more specific answers please.

zen2bop asked:


I have heard they do.
The 4th amendment of the United States Constitution is supposed to protect citizens from unlawful search and seizures.Or does it?
Do the words unreasonable search and seizure and probable cause sound familiar? You betcha.

bushfan88 asked:


New York politicians allowed up to one-third of the $20 billion in federal aid awarded to the city in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks to be squandered right under their noses, an analysis by the New York Daily News found last December.

But that hasn’t stopped some of the same politicians from complaining all weekend about a mere $80 million cut in New York City’s federal anti-terrorism budget.

Senators Hillary Clinton, Charles Schumer and Rep. Peter King say they’re outraged over the new cuts, with Clinton and King teaming up to launch a post-card writing campaign against the Department of Homeland Security.

The bipartisan duo sounded a lot less angry six months ago, when the News uncovered evidence that billions in 9/11 cash had been misspent, gone unaccounted for and, in at least one case, was awarded to the Mafia.

charlessmith702210@sbcglobal.net asked:


I can guess that there is a 10 year imprisonment and/or a $250,000 in one provision of the Homeland Security laws that provides this penalty to any American who mentions any detail on how they arrived into highly classified or restricted areas of Cuba, especially from Miami.

Boring Name asked:


That would be kinda fun to have personalized treatment by a large organization.

margie s asked:


he has a voice that sound like someone is choking him. He talks so fast with some many uh’s I’m never sure what he is saying.

jesswzmn asked:


I think its a very good signal for americans…and I think even real republicans who are not neocons should be happy too.

you get to explain how you came to your conclusion…mr. first poster?

The question was why is the arizona governor appointed and what is the signal.
man ..its really hard to get some intelligent discourse going on this site.
there seems to be this trend of people thinking its cute to pretend to be ignorant. I don’t get it.